Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and Ferguson
hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed mixed hemorrhoids. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients with
prolapsed mixed hemorrhoids treated in Xinrongqi Hospital in Ronggui Street of Shunde District
in Foshan City from June 2018 to June 2019 were analyzed and randomly divided into observation
groups (receiving LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy, n=60) and controls methods. Group (received Ferguson
hemorrhoidectomy, n=60)according to different surgical . The two groups were compared for the number
of days of postoperative hospitalization, the cost of hospitalization, the amount of intraoperative bleeding,
the time of operation, postoperative pain, postoperative anal sphincter function and postoperative urinary retention, postoperative bleeding, wound infection, postoperative recurrence, and anal stenosis and other
differences. Results The number of hospital stays, hospitalization costs, intraoperative blood loss, and
operation time in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There
was no significant difference in wound healing time between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no
significant differences in the incidence of urinary retention, postoperative bleeding, incision infection,
postoperative recurrence, and anal stenosis (P>0.05). The observation group had low pain scores at 1, 2,
3, 7 and 14 days after surgery. In the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05),
and there was no significant difference in the maximum systolic pressure and resting anal pressure of
the anal canal between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy is safe and
effective for patients with prolapsed mixed hemorrhoids. Compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, it
can help shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, it is conducive to patient recovery.