Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical effi cacy of laparoscopic plain tension-free hernia repair and hernia ring filling tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Method Ninety patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Qingyang Hospital in Jiangyin City from January 2021 to December 2023 were selected and divided into a study group and a routine group, with 45 patients in each group, based on diff erent surgical methods. The conventional group underwent tension-free hernia repair with hernia ring filling, while the study group underwent laparoscopic plain mesh tension-free hernia repair. The surgical related indicators, treatment outcomes,and complications of the two groups were compared. Result The overall treatment effi cacy rate of the study group patients (97.78%) was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (75.56%). The surgical duration and postoperative time to get out of bed of the study group patients were shorter than those of the conventional group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the conventional group, with signifi cant diff erences (P ＜ 0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was 2.22% (1/45), signifi cantly lower than that in the conventional group [6.67% (3/45)], and the difference was significant (χ2=4.406, P=0.036). Conclusion Laparoscopic plain fi lm tension-free hernia repair is safe and eff ective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, with a lower risk of complications.

Key words: Inguinal hernia, Tension-free hernia repair surgery, Laparoscope