Abstract:

Objective To analyze the value of different schemes in the treatment of small colorectal polyps. Method From January 2020 to January 2021, 60 patients with small colorectal polyps admitted to Jilin Cancer Hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups (30 patients in each group). The control group was treated with hot snare resection under enteroscope, and the observation group was treated with cold snare resection under enteroscope. The clinical efficacy, complications, surgery and recovery, and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. Result The clinical efficacy of the observation group (96.67%) was higher than that of the control group (80.00%), and the incidence of complications (6.67%) was lower than that of the control group (26.67%), with significant differences (P<0.05). The number of polyps removed and the diameter of polyps in the observation group were not significantly different from those in the control group, but the polyp removal time and colonoscopy operation time were shorter than those in the control group, with significant differences (P ＜ 0.05). There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the time of underground activity and hospitalization expenses, but the hospitalization time was shorter than the control group, and the incision size was larger than the control group, with significant differences (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the treatment of small colorectal polyps with hot snare resection under colonoscopy, cold snare resection under colonoscopy is safer and more effective. By shortening the resection time, it can promote patients to go to the ground and leave hospital as soon as possible.

Key words: Enteroscope, Cold snare resection, Heat snare resection, Small colorectal polyps, Curative effect