Abstract:

Objective To analyze the effect of laparoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Method From July 2018 to July 2021, 50 male patients with inguinal hernia from Xingpu Hospital in Suzhou Industrial Park were selected and randomly divided into the reference group (treated with traditional open surgery) and the research group (treated with laparoscopic surgery) by using the method of random color ball sampling. There were 25 patients in each group, and the surgical indicators and postoperative quality of life of the two groups were compared. Result The incidence of complications such as scrotal hematoma and incision infection in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P ＜ 0.05); The operation time, hospital stay and bed rest time of the patients in the study group were shorter than those in the reference group, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding was less than that in the reference group, with a significant difference (P ＜ 0.05). The post-operative pain scores of patients in the study group were lower than those in the reference group, and the quality of life scores were higher than those in the reference group, with significant differences (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is more effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, which can reduce complications, optimize surgical indicators, promote postoperative recovery, reduce pain. 

Key words: Laparoscopic surgery, Traditional open surgery, Inguinal hernia