Journal of General Surgery for Clinicians ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 23-.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A comparative study on the clinical treatment eff ect of circular areola and radial incision surgery on patients with breast fi broadenoma

  

  1. General Surgery Department of Fengkai County People's Hospital in Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Zhaoqing 526500, China
  • Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-10-16

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical effi cacy of using circular areola and radial incision treatment for benign breast tumors. Method Fifty patients with benign breast tumors admitted to our hospital from September 2019 to January 2024 were divided into two groups using a random number table method, with 25 cases in each group. The research group underwent circumareolar incision surgery, while the control group underwent radial incision surgery. Compare the clinical efficacy, perioperative indicators, breast aesthetics score, sensory nerve function in the areola area, and complications between two groups. Result Compared with the control group, the study group had a higher overall treatment effi cacy, shorter surgical scar length, longer surgical time, more bleeding, higher satisfaction with breast aesthetics, better postoperative recovery of sensory nerve function in the areola area,

and lower incidence of complications, with signifi cant diff erences (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both types of incision surgery can eff ectively treat benign breast tumors. However, patients undergoing circumareolar incision surgery have smaller residual scars on the body surface, resulting in better treatment outcomes. Additionally, postoperative patients have a higher satisfaction with breast aesthetics and will not aff ect the sensory nerve function in the areola area. With fewer complications, it is safe and reliable.

Key words: Benign breast tumors, Circumareolar incision, Radial incision, Neurological function, Breast aesthetics