Abstract:

Objective To explore the short-term clinical efficacy of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Method The data of 80 patients with gastric cancer treated by complete laparoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery in Qiqihar Public Security Hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were treated by complete laparoscopic surgery as the observation group (n=40), and the patients were treated by laparoscopic surgery as the control group (n=40). The postoperative effects of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed. Result The VAS scores of patients in the observation group were higher than those of patients in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 days after operation (P ＜ 0.05); The

first scheduling time, the incidence of complications, the length of abdominal incision and the first postoperative fluid diet time in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P ＜ 0.05); The operation time of patients in the control group was significantly better than that of patients in the observation group (P ＜ 0.05); There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes and application of analgesics, between the two groups（P ＞ 0.05）. Conclusion Compared with laparoscopy, although the operation time of complete laparoscopic assisted surgery is longer, its first scheduling time and the first liquid diet time are shorter, which is more conducive to the early rehabilitation of patients and can be selectively used in clinical practice.

Key words: Complete laparoscopy, Laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, Clinical efficacy