临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 85-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

结直肠癌患者围手术期实施加速康复外科精准护理的效果及影响

  

  1. 深圳市宝安区中心医院 普外科,广东 深圳 518000
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2026-01-30
  • 基金资助:

    深圳市宝安区医学会医疗卫生科研项目(BAYXH2023081)

Effect and influence of perioperative implementation of accelerated rehabilitation surgery precision nursing in patients with colorectal cancer

  1. General Surgery Department of Shenzhen Bao’an District Central Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-01-30

摘要:

目的 研究结直肠癌患者围手术期实施加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)精准护理的效果及对患者应激反应、心理状态的影响。方法 纳入 2024 年 1 月至 2025 年 4 月深圳市宝安区中心医院收治的接受手术治疗的结直肠癌患者 110 例,以随机数字表法对其划分成试验组以及对照组,各 55 例。对照组实施围手术期常规护理干预,试验组实施围手术期 ERAS 精准护理。比较两组患者术后恢复情况、炎症指标水平、负性情绪和护理满意度。结果 试验组患者术后排气、排便、下床活动、进食流质食物以及住院的时间均短于对照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.001)。两组术前 1d 的血清 C 反应蛋白及白介素 -6、焦虑自评量表及抑郁自评量表评分相比,差异不显著(P > 0.05);两组术后 1d、3d 及 5d 的血清 C 反应蛋白及白介素 -6 较术前 1d 更低,且试验组较对照组低(P < 0.001);两组术后 3d 的 SAS 及 SDS 评分较术前更低,且试验组较对照组低(P < 0.001)。试验组的护理满意度为 98.18%(54/55),较对照组 87.27%(48/55)更高,差异有显著性(P < 0.05)。结论 结直肠癌患者围手术期实施 ERAS 精准护理的效果较好,能够有效改善患者的应激反应,优化其心理状态。

关键词: 结直肠癌, 围手术期, 加速康复外科, 精准, 护理, 效果

Abstract:

Objective To study the effect of perioperative implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) precision nursing in patients with colorectal cancer and its impact on patients’ stress response and psychological state. Method A total of 110 patients with colorectal cancer who received surgical treatment in the Central Hospital of Bao’an District in Shenzhen from January 2024 to April 2025 were selected and randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 55 cases in each group. The control group received perioperative routine nursing intervention, and the experimental group received perioperative eras precise nursing. The postoperative recovery, inflammatory index level, negative emotions and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Result The time of exhaust, defecation, getting out of bed, eating liquid food and hospitalization in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were significant (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores of serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale between the two groups one day before operation (P > 0.05); The levels of serum C reactive protein and interleukin-6 at 1d, 3d and 5d after operation in the two groups were lower than those at 1d before operation, and the levels of serum C reactive protein and interleukin-6 in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001); The SAS and SDS scores of the two groups at 3 days after operation were lower than those before operation, and the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.001). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was 98.18% (54/55), which was significantly higher than 87.27% (48/55) of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The implementation of ERAS precision nursing in the perioperative period of colorectal cancer patients is more effective, which can effectively improve the stress response of patients and optimize their psychological state.

Key words: Colorectal cancer, Perioperative period, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Precision, Nursing