临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 38-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科模式下微创胆总管切开取石术的临床体会

  

  1. 青岛市市立医院 康复大学青岛医院 肝胆胰外科,山东 青岛 266071
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2026-01-29
  • 基金资助:

    青岛市2023年度医药卫生科研指导项目(2023-WJZD161)

Clinical experience of minimally invasive choledocholithotomy under enhanced recovery after surgery mode

  1. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department of Qingdao Municipal Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Shandong Qingdao 266071, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-01-29

摘要:

目的 探讨加速康复模式下腹腔镜和机器人辅助胆总管切开取石术的临床体会。方法 回顾性分析青岛市市立医院东院 2020 年 1 月至 2025 年 4 月接受加速康复模式管理的胆总管切开取石术的 193 例患者的临床资料,总结手术方式、术中出血和术后并发症等情况,比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助胆总管切开取石术的围手术期及预后情况。结果 193 例患者中,177 例接受腹腔镜手术,16 例接受机器人辅助手术。手术时间(144.84±54.17)min,术中出血 10(10,20)ml,术后住院天数(5.85±3.60)d。胆总管一期缝合 85 例,留置 T 形管 108 例(56%)。术后发生肺炎 2 例,尿路感染 2 例,腹腔感染 1 例,腹腔积液 1 例,切口感染 1 例,下肢静脉血栓形成 1 例,均经保守治疗好转,术后发生胆总管相对狭窄 1 例,经胆总管球囊扩张治疗后好转。机器人手术组比腹腔镜手术组患者总住院费用高 [(52 167.09±10 079.63)元比(23 882.27±10 289.22)元)],差异有显著性(P < 0.001)。结论 加速康复模式下微创胆总管切开取石术,减轻了患者围手术期应激反应,促进患者康复。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 胆总管切开取石术, 机器人, 腹腔镜

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical experience of laparoscopic and robot assisted choledocholithotomy under enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) mode. Method The clinical data of 193 patients with choledocholithotomy in the Eastern Hospital of Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to April 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation methods, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications were summarized. The perioperative period and prognosis of laparoscopic and robot assisted choledocholithotomy were compared. Result of the 193 patients, 177 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 16 underwent robot assisted surgery. The operation time was (144.84±54.17)min, the intraoperative blood loss was (18.96±22.11)ml, and the postoperative hospital stay was (5.85±3.60)d. There were 85 cases of primary suture of common bile duct and 108 cases of indwelling T-tube (56%). There were 2 cases of postoperative pneumonia, 2 cases of urinary tract infection, 1 case of abdominal infection, 1 case of peritoneal effusion, 1 case of incision infection, 1 case of lower extremity venous thrombosis, all of which were improved by conservative treatment, 1 case of relatively narrow common bile duct occurred after operation, and improved after balloon dilatation of common bile duct. The total cost of hospitalization in the robot surgery group was higher than that in the laparoscopic surgery group [(52 167.09±10 079.63)yuan vs (23 882.27±10 289.22)yuan], and the difference was significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion Minimally invasive choledocholithotomy under accelerated rehabilitation mode can reduce the perioperative stress response of patients and promote the rehabilitation of patients.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Choledocholithotomy, Robot, Laparoscope