临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 2-.

• •    下一篇

原发性肝细胞癌骨转移患者的治疗策略及预后因素分析

  

  1. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院 胆胰外科,广东 广州 510120
  • 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-10-16
  • 基金资助:

    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515011217)

Analysis of therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors in patients with bone metastasis from primary hepatocellular carcinoma

  1. Pancreaticobiliary Surgery Department of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-10-16

摘要:

目的 探究治疗方式与肝细胞癌(肝癌)骨转移患者生存期与治疗策略的关系特点,分析影响原发性肝癌骨转移(hepatocellular carcinoma bone metastasis,HCC-BM)患者生存及预后的因素。方法 回顾 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院收治的 HCC-BM 患者的临床资料,分析 HCC-BM的基本特征,使用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算中位生存期、绘制生存曲线,有无原发灶治疗、有无骨转移灶治疗、原发灶各种治疗方案组患者间比较采用 Log-Rank 检验,将影响患者生存的因素纳入 Cox 回归模型行单因素回归分析,并将其中有意义的变量纳入多因素 Cox 回归模型,以确定影响 HCC-BM 患者生存的独立危险因素。结果 共纳入 HCC-BM 患者 81 例,HCC-BM 患者的中位间隔期为 10.5 个月,中位生存期为 7.3个月,1 年、2 年和 3 年生存率分别是 37.0%、17.3% 和 6.2%。原发灶治疗与否、单药和联合治疗与未行原发灶治疗、行骨转移灶治疗与否的 HCC-BM 患者生存期均有显著差异(P 均< 0.05)。单因素回归分析显示甲胎蛋白和碱性磷酸酶水平、有无血管侵犯、Child-Pugh 评分、骨转移瘤数量、有无全身多部位骨转移、原发灶治疗与否、骨转移灶治疗与否、有无靶向联合免疫治疗与 HCC-BM 患者的预后相关(P 均< 0.05)。多因素回归分析显示甲胎蛋白≥ 400μg/L、全身多部位骨转移、未行原发灶治疗、未行靶向联合免疫治疗均是 HCC-BM 患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P 均< 0.05)。结论 HCC-BM 发生率高,间隔期和生存期短。行骨转移灶治疗可延长 HCC-BM 患者生存期。原发灶的联合治疗可显著提高 HCC-BM 患者的生存期,其有望成为 HCC-BM 治疗的更优选择。甲胎蛋白≥ 400μg/L、全身多部位骨转移、未行原发灶治疗、未行靶向联合免疫治疗均是 HCC-BM 患者预后不良的独立危险因素。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 骨转移, 治疗策略, 预后, 影响因素

Abstract:

Objective To explore the relationship between therapy and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma bone metastasis(HCC-BM) patients, and analyze the factors aff ecting the survival of HCC-BM patients. Method The clinical data of HCC-BM patients admitted to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the median survival time and draw the survival curve. Log-Rank test was used for comparison between groups with or without primary tumor treatment, with or without bone metastasis treatment, and various treatment regimens for primary tumor. Factors that may affect the survival of patients such as gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein were included in the Cox regression model for univariate regression analysis, and signifi cant variables were included in the multivariate Cox regression model to identify the independent risk factors aff ecting the survival of HCC-BM patients. Result A total of 81 HCC-BM patients were enrolled, the median interval of HCC-BM patients was 10.5 months, the median survival time was 7.3 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 37.0%, 17.3%, and 6.2%, respectively. Log-Rank test showed that there were statistically signifi cant diff erences in survival time between HCC-BM patients with or without primary tumor treatment, monotherapy or combination therapy and HCC-BM patients without primary tumor treatment, and bone metastasis treatment or not (all P < 0.05). Univariate regression analysis showed that alpha-fetoprotein and alkaline phosphatase levels, vascular invasion, Child-Pugh score, number of bone metastases, systemic multiple bone metastases, treatment of the primary tumor, treatment of bone metastases, and targeted combined immunotherapy were associated with the prognosis of HCC-BM patients (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400μg/L, systemic multiple bone metastases, no primary tumor treatment, and no targeted combined immunotherapy were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of HCC-BM patients (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The morbidity of HCC-BM is high, and the interval and survival time of HCC-BM are short. Treatment of bone metastases can prolong the survival of HCC- BM patients. Combined therapy targeting the primary lesion significantly improves survival outcomes in HCC- BM patients, which is expected to become a better choice for HCC-BM treatment. Alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400μg/L, systemic multiple bone metastases, no primary tumor treatment, and no targeted therapy combined immunotherapy are independent risk factors for poor prognosis of HCC-BM patients.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Bone metastasis, Therapeutic strategy, Prognosis , Infl uence factor