临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 7-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的老年患者治疗方式的选择和疗效分析

  

  1. 平度市人民医院 肝胆外科,山东 青岛 266700
  • 出版日期:2023-04-01 发布日期:2023-05-23

The choice and efficacy of treatment for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis

  1. Hepatobiliary Surgery Department of Pingdu People's Hospital, Shandong Qingdao 266700, China
  • Online:2023-04-01 Published:2023-05-23

摘要:

目的 探讨胆总管结石合并胆囊结石老年患者的治疗方案的选择及疗效。方法 回顾性分析2017 年2 月至2019 年11 月于平度市人民医院确诊为胆囊结石合并胆总管结石66 例老年患者资料,根据手术方式不同分成观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=32),观察组采用分步内镜下乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy,EST)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗,对照组采用LC 联合腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration T-tube choledochotomy,LCBDE)

治疗。比较两组的总手术时间、术后引流管留置时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、腹腔镜中转开腹、结石清除率、术后并发症(包括发热、胆漏、胰腺炎)。结果 观察组患者的总手术时间、引流管留置时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,术中中转开腹率低于对照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05)。两组患者的结石清除率及术后并发症发生率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论 EST+LC 和LC+LCBDE 均能较好地治疗老年患者胆囊结石合并胆总管结石,但在医师技术和手术设备均具备的条件下,选择EST+LC 治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石对老年患者更加有益。

关键词: 老年, 胆总管结石, 胆囊结石, 内镜下乳头括约肌切开术, 腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术, 腹腔镜胆囊切除术

Abstract:

Objective To explore the choice and efficacy of treatment for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis. Method The elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis diagnosed in Pingdu People's Hospital hospital from February 2017 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group (n=34) and the control group (n=32). The observation group was treated with step-by-step endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy(EST) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and the control group was treated with LC combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration T-tube choledochotomy (LCBDE). The total operation time, indwelling time of drainage tube after operation, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, stone removal rate, and postoperative complications (including fever, bile leakage, pancreatitis) were compared between the two groups. Result The total operation time, drainage tube retention time, and postoperative hospitalization time of patients in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, with less intraoperative bleeding and lower conversion rate to laparotomy in the observation group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in stone removal rate and postoperative complication rate (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both EST+LC and LC+LCBDE can effectively treat the elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis, but in county hospitals with both technology and equipment, EST+LC is more beneficial for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

Key words: Elderly, Choledocholithiasis, Gallstone, Endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration T-tube choledochotomy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy