临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3): 137-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

选择性痔上黏膜切除术低位吻合联合潜行剥离术与自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗Ⅳ期混合痔的疗效比较

  

  1. 宜兴市第四人民医院 肛肠科,江苏 宜兴 214203
  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-10-25

Comparison of curative effect between tissue-selecting therapy stapler and low anastomosis combined with stealth dissection and ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid combined with external dissection and internal ligation in the treatment of stage Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids

  1. Anorectal Department of Yixing Fourth People's Hospital, Jiangsu Yixing 214203, China
  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-10-25

摘要:

目的 对比分析选择性痔上黏膜切除术(tissue-selecting therapy stapler,TST)低位吻合联合潜行剥离术与自动痔疮套扎术(ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid,RPH)联合外剥内扎术治疗Ⅳ期混合痔的临床疗效。方法 选取2020 年1 至12 月在宜兴市第四人民医院治疗的75 例Ⅳ期混合痔患者,将其随机分为观察组(40 例) 与对照组(35 例)。观察组患者采取TST 低位吻合联合潜行剥离术治疗,对照组患者采用RPH联合外剥内扎术治疗,对比两组患者术中指标、恢复指标、并发症发生率、疗效及复发率。结果 观察组患者的术中出血量及手术时间少于对照组(P < 0.05),术后疼痛时间、疼痛消失时间、住院时间及愈合时间均短于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后肛缘水肿发生率少于对照组(P < 0.05),但两组患者术后出血、肛门坠胀、切口感染发生率无明显差异(P > 0.05)。观察组与对照组患者的总有效率及复发率无明显差异(P > 0.05),但观察组治愈率高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论 对于Ⅳ期混合痔患者,TST 低位吻合联合潜行剥离术与RPH 联合外剥内扎术临床疗效相当,但TST 低位吻合联合潜行剥离术损伤小,疼痛轻,术后恢复快,水肿发生率低,治愈率高。

关键词: 混合痔, 选择性痔上黏膜切除术, 自动痔疮套扎术, 外剥内扎术, 潜行剥离术, 疗效

Abstract:

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of tissue-selecting therapy stapler (TST) and low anastomosis combined with latent dissection and Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid (RPH) combined with external dissection and internal ligation in the treatment of stage Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids. Method 75 patients with stage Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids treated in Yixing Fourth People's Hospital from January to December 2020 were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group (35 cases). The patients in the observation group were treated with TST and low anastomosis combined with latent dissection, and the patients in the control group were treated with RPH combined with external dissection and internal ligation. The intraoperative indexes, recovery indexes, complication rate, curative effect and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Result The amount of bleeding and operation time in the observation group were less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative anal edema in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, anal distension and incision infection between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the total effective rate and recurrence rate between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05), but the cure rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion for patients with stage Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids, the clinical efficacy of TST low anastomosis combined with latent dissection is equivalent to that of RPH combined with external dissection and internal ligation. However, TST low anastomosis combined with latent dissection has the advantages of small injury, light pain, rapid postoperative recovery, low incidence of edema and high cure rate.

Key words: Mixed hemorrhoids, Tissue-selecting therapy stapler, ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid, External stripping and internal ligation, Stealth dissection, Curative effect