临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4): 53-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的疗效对比

  

  1. 赤壁市人民医院 普外二科,湖北 咸宁 437300
  • 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-12-23

Comparing the efficacy of totally extraperitoneal prosthesis and transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis in the treatment of inguinal hernia

  1. General Surgery Department of Chibi People's Hospital,Xianning 437300, Hubei
  • Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-12-23

摘要:

目的 探讨完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthesis,TEP) 与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis,TAPP) 治疗腹股沟疝气疗效。方法 选取赤壁市人民医院2017 年5 月至2020 年5 月收治的腹股沟疝气患者74 例,采用随机数字法将患者分成TEP 组及TAPP 组,每组37 例。TEP 组接受TEP 治疗,TAPP 组接受TAPP 治疗。比较两组患者一般指标、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)疼痛评分、炎性细胞因子水平、并发症发生情况。结果 TEP 组患者手术时间短于TAPP 组(P < 0.05),下床活动时间、住院时间、术中出血量与TAPP 组差异无显著性(P > 0.05)。术前,两组患者VAS 评分差异无显著性(P> 0.05);术后,TAPP 组术后2h、12h 患者VAS 评分与TEP 组差异无显著性(P > 0.05)。术前,

两组患者白介素-6、C 反应蛋白、白细胞计数比较差异无显著性(P > 0.05);术后,TAPP 组患者白介素-6、C 反应蛋白、白细胞计数与TEP 组差异无显著性(P > 0.05)。TAPP 组并发症发生率低于TEP 组(P < 0.05)。结论 TAPP 较TEP 手术时间短,术后并发症及炎症反应少,疗效可靠。

关键词: 完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术, 经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术, 腹股沟疝气, 疗效

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the efficacy of totally extraperitoneal prosthesis (TEP) and

transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods 74 inguinal

hernia patients in Chibi People's Hospital from May 2017 to May 2020 were randomly selected and

divided into TEP group and TAPP group by random number method, with 37 patients in each group. TEP

group received TEP surgical treatment, and TAPP group received TAPP treatment. General indicators,

pain, inflammatory cytokine levels and complications were compared between the two groups. Results

The time of operation in TEP group was less than that in TAPP group (P < 0.05), the time of bed

activity, length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss were more than that in TAPP group, and

the difference was not statistically significant(P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS

score between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). VAS scores of patients in the TAPP group

2h and 12h after surgery were lower than those in the TEP group, but the difference was not statistically significant(P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and white

blood cell levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). The levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein

and white blood cell in the TAPP group were lower than those in the TEP group, but the difference

was not statistically significant(P > 0.05). The complication rate of TAPP group was lower than that

of TEP group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with TEP, TAPP has shorter operation time and less

postoperative complications and inflammatory reactions. It is reliable efficacy.

Key words: Totally extraperitoneal prosthesis, Transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis, Inguinal hernia, Efficacy