临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4): 2-.

• •    下一篇

腹腔镜肝切除术应用低中心静脉压技术导致气栓与脑损伤风险探讨

  

  1. 梅州市人民医院 麻醉科,广东 梅州 514031
  • 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-12-23
  • 基金资助:

    广东省医学科研基金(B2018042)

The discussion in risk of air embolus and brain injury by low central venous pressure by laparoscopic hepatectomy

  1. Anesthesiology Department of Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou 514031, Guangdong
  • Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-12-23

摘要:

目的 探讨在腹腔镜肝切除术中应用低中心静脉压技术时产生气栓的情况及其可能带来的脑损伤风险。方法 选取2018 年4 月至2021 年1 月梅州市人民医院择期行腹腔镜肝切除术的患者80 例,随机分为低中心静脉压组(L 组)和正常中心静脉压组(N 组),各40 例。比较两组患者经食管超声心动图检查心腔内的气体发生率、气泡分级及持续时间,术后神经系统并发症、术后住院时间,术前、术后静脉血中S100B 蛋白和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)水平。结果 最终纳入66 例患者,L 组35 例,N 组31 例。L 组患者术中气泡的持续时间长于N 组(P < 0.05)。L、N 两组术后S100B 蛋白相比术前均有所增高,而L 组术后NSE 水平也高于术前(P < 0.05)。两组间患者的气栓发生率、气泡分级、术后神经系统并发症发生率、术后住院时间,术前、术后静脉血中S100B 蛋白和NSE 水平,以及N 组患者术前、术后NSE,差异均无显著性(P > 0.05)。结论 在腹腔镜肝切除术中,应用低中心静脉压与维持正常中心静脉压相比,气栓的持续时间有所延长,气栓的发生率及脑损伤风险无显著差别。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 肝切除术, 经食管超声心动图, 中心静脉压, 气栓, 脑损伤

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the development of air thrombolysis and the possible risk of

brain injury in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods 80 patients with selected laparoscopic hepatectomy

from Meizhou People's Hospital from April 2018 to January 2021, randomly divided into low central

venous pressure group (L group) and normal central venous pressure group (N group) and 40 each.

Gas incidence, bubble grade and duration were examined by esophageal echocardiography in both

groups which were compared in two groups; Postoperative neurological complications, postoperative

hospitalization, S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels in preoperative and

postoperative venous blood were compared in two groups. Results Eventually included 66 patients, 35 in

the L group and 31 in the N group. The intraoperative duration of air bubbles in the L group was longer

than in the N group (P < 0.05).Both L, N groups had increased postoperative S100B protein compared to preoperative, while postoperative NSE levels were also higher in the L group (P < 0.05). There were

no significant differences in thrombolysis, bubble grade, postoperative neurological complications, time

of hospitalization, S100B protein and NSE levels in preoperative and postoperative venous blood, and

preoperative and postoperative NSE, differences in the N group (P > 0.05). Conclusion In laparoscopic

hepatectomy, the application of low central venous pressure increased the duration of thrombolysis,

especially between the incidence of thrombolysis and the risk of brain injury.

Key words: Laparoscopic, Hepatectomy, Transesophageal echocardiography, Center venous pressure, Air embolus, Brain injury