燃料与化工 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 49-51.

• 煤气净化与化学产品加工 • 上一篇    下一篇

HPF法与真空碳酸钾法脱硫工艺的比较

罗万江1  宋英方2  刘小静1   

  1. 1.陕西煤业化工集团陕焦化工有限公司,  渭南711712; 2.重庆钢铁股份公司焦化厂,  重庆401220
  • 出版日期:2015-11-12

Comparison between HPF desulfurization and vacuum potassium carbonate desulfurization

Luo Wanjiang1  Song Yingfang2  Liu Xiaojing1   

  1. 1.Shanjiao Chemical Co.,Ltd.,Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group,Weinan 711712,China; 2.Coking Plant of Chongqing Iron & Steel Co.,Ltd.,Chongqing 401220,China
  • Online:2015-11-12

摘要:

介绍了HPF法和真空碳酸钾法脱硫工艺,比较了2种工艺的优缺点。分析表明,HPF法脱硫工艺的投资费用低,操作简单,但运行费用高,生产的硫磺品质低,产生的废液量大,环保问题严重;真空碳酸钾法脱硫工艺的投资费用高,工艺复杂,生产的硫酸可直接用于氨回收,运行费用低。

Abstract:

This paper introduces HPF desulfurization and vacuum potassium carbonate desulfurization and compares the advantages and disadvantages of these two processes.Analysis shows that HPF desulfurization has the advantages of low investment,simple operation,but it has the disadvantages of high operation cost,low quality sulfur produced,large amount of waste water generated and serious pollution problem; while vacuum potassium carbonate desulfurization needs higher investment,is complex in process,but it cost less for operation and the product sulfuric acid can be directly used for ammonia recovery.

中图分类号: