临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 45-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的效果及安全性分析

  

  1. 昆山宗仁卿纪念医院 普外科,江苏 昆山 215300
  • 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2022-07-18

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic-assisted small incision thyroidectomy for benign thyroid tumors

  1. General Surgery Department of Kunshan Zongrenqing Memorial Hospital, Jiangsu Kunshan 215300, China
  • Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-07-18

摘要:

目的 探讨应用腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤与传统开放式甲状腺手术治疗的差异,并观察手术的安全性。方法 选取昆山宗仁卿纪念医院2019 年9 月至2020 年9 月接诊的70例甲状腺良性肿瘤患者,根据手术方式不同分为两组,各35 例。其中,接受传统开放式甲状腺手术治疗的患者为参照组,接受腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺手术治疗的患者为研究组,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、治疗用时、瘢痕满意度、并发症发生情况、疼痛程度及复发率等。结果 研究组患者手术用时长于参照组,但术中出血量及术后引流量均低于参照组(P < 0.05)。研究组患者治疗后恢复出院的用时短于参照组,且患者术后对瘢痕的满意度高于参照组(P < 0.05),并发症发生率低于参照组(P < 0.05)。两组患者接受治疗前疼痛程度无显著差异(P > 0.05),接受治疗后参照组患者疼痛程度无显著变化(P > 0.05),而研究组患者接受治疗后疼痛程度较治疗前及参照组患者均低(P < 0.05)。两组患者1 年内复发率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论 应用腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤比传统开放式甲状腺手术的治疗效果更好,虽然手术用时有所增加,但是能够减少患者的出血量和引流量,降低患者的疼痛感,减少出现并发症发生率率,患者对于遗留的瘢痕更容易接受。

关键词: 腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺手术, 甲状腺良性肿瘤, 传统开放式甲状腺手术, 疗效

Abstract:

Objective To compare the difference between endoscopic-assisted small incision thyroidectomy and traditional open thyroidectomy in the treatment of benign thyroid tumors, and to observe the safety of the operation. Method 70 patients with benign thyroid tumors treated in Kunshan Zongrenqing Memorial Hospital from September 2019 to September 2020 were divided into two groups by different surgical method, 35 cases in each group. Among them, those who received traditional open thyroidectomy were the control group, and those who received endoscopic-assisted small neck incision thyroidectomy were the study group, the operation indexes, treatment time, scar satisfaction, complications, pain degree and recurrence rate were compared under different schemes. Result The operation time in the study group was longer than that in the reference group, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage were lower than those in the reference group (P < 0.05).

The time of recovery and discharge in the study group was shorter than that in the reference group, and the patients' 

satisfaction with scar was higher than that in the reference group (P < 0.05), and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the degree of pain between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05), and there was no significant change in the degree of pain in the reference group after treatment (P > 0.05), while the degree of pain in the study group was lower than that before treatment and in the reference group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups within 1 year (P > 0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic-assisted neck small incision thyroid surgery is better than traditional open thyroid surgery in the treatment of benign thyroid tumors. Although the operation time has increased, it can reduce the amount of bleeding and drainage, reduce the pain of patients, reduce the incidence of complications, and patients are more likely to accept the remaining scars.

Key words: Endoscopic-assisted small incision thyroidectomy, Benign thyroid tumor, Traditional open thyroidectomy, Curative effect