临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 9-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

肠道准备失败风险预测模型联合时效激励理论对首次结肠镜检查患者肠道准备的影响研究

  

  1. 1. 青岛市市立医院(康复大学青岛医院) 本部消化内二科,山东 青岛 266011;2. 青岛市市立医院(康复大学青岛医院) 护理部,山东 青岛 266011
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2026-01-29

The effect of bowel preparation failure risk model prediction combined with time-based incentive theory on bowel preparation in patients undergoing first colonoscopy

  1. 1.The Second Gastroenterology Department of Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Rehabilitation University Qingdao Hospital, Shandong Qingdao 266011, China; 2. Nursing Department of Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Rehabilitation University Qingdao Hospital, Shandong Qingdao 266011, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-01-29

摘要:

目的 探讨肠道准备失败风险预测模型联合时效激励理论在首次行结肠镜检查患者中的应用效果。方法 选取 2025 年 3 月至 5 月青岛市市立医院 360 例患者作为研究对象,应用随机数字表法分为联合组、预测组和对照组,各 120 例,对照组进行常规肠道准备,预测组进行肠道准备失败风险预测模型的肠道准备,联合组进行肠道准备失败风险预测模型联合时效激励理论的肠道准备方案,应用波士顿肠道准备量表、精神疲惫程度量表、肠道准备耐受性量表和肠道准备满意度量表比较三组患者的肠道准备质量、精神疲惫程度、对肠道准备方案的耐受性和满意度。结果 联合组患者因自身工作原因择期再做导致脱组 2 例,共118 例被纳入研究;预测组患者因自身工作原因择期再做导致脱组 3 例,因恐惧导致脱组 3 例,共 114 例被纳入研究;对照组因患者服药后未排泄干净而需择期再做导致脱组 2 例,因自身工作原因择期再做导致脱组 2 例,共 116 例被纳入研究。联合组肠道准备质量得分、精神疲惫得分、对肠道准备方案的恶心、呕吐、乏力、耐受性和满意度优于预测组和对照组,差异有显著性(P < 0.05)。结论 对首次行结肠镜检查的患者实行肠道准备失败风险预测模型联合时效激励理论的肠道准备方案,可提高患者肠道准备质量,改善患者精神疲惫、耐受性和提升患者满意度。

关键词: 时效激励理论, 风险预测模型, 肠道准备, 耐受性, 满意度

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the application effects of a risk prediction model for bowel preparation failure combined with time-based incentive theory in patients undergoing their first colonoscopy. Method A total of 360 patients from March to May 2025 in Qingdao Municipal Hospital were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly assigned into three groups using a digital lottery system: a combined group (120 cases), a prediction group (120 cases), and a control group (120 cases). The control group received standard bowel preparation protocols, while the prediction group underwent bowel preparation guided by the risk prediction model. The combined group received bowel preparation protocols integrating both the risk prediction model and time-based incentive theory. The quality of bowel preparation, mental fatigue levels, tolerance to bowel preparation protocols, and patient satisfaction were assessed using the Boston bowel preparation scale, mental fatigue scale, bowel preparation tolerance scale, and bowel preparation satisfaction scale. Result In the combined group, 2 patients dropped out of the group due to their own work reasons, and a total of 118 patients were included in the study; In the prediction group, 3 patients dropped out of the group due to their own work reasons, and 3 patients dropped out of the group due to fear, a total of 114 cases were included in the study; In the control group, 2 patients were out of the group because they did not excrete clean after taking medicine and needed to do it again at a selected time, and 2 patients were out of the group because of their own work, a total of 116 cases were included in the study. The combined group demonstrated significantly higher scores in bowel preparation quality, mental fatigue levels, tolerability and tolerance to bowel preparation protocols compared to both the prediction group and control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Implementing a bowel preparation protocol that combines the risk prediction model for bowel preparation failure with time-based incentive theory in first-time colonoscopy patients can improve bowel preparation quality, reduce mental fatigue, enhance tolerance, and increase patient satisfaction.

Key words: Time-based incentive theory, Risk model prediction, Bowel preparation, Tolerance, Satisfaction