临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 35-.

• • 上一篇    

右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对老年结直肠癌根治术患者的影响

  

  1. 广东医科大学附属第二医院 麻醉科,广东 湛江 524003
  • 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 基金资助:
    湛江市非资助科技攻关计划项目(2018B01037)

Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine transverse abdominis plane block on elderly patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer

  1. Anesthesiology Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,
    Zhanjiang 524003, Guangdong
  • Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-05-08

摘要: 摘要:目的 探讨右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对老年结直肠癌根治术患者的影响。方法 选取2018 年7 月至2020 年7 月广东医科大学附属第二医院接受结直肠癌根治术治疗的64 例患者为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组各32 例,对照组采用罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞,研究组在对照组基础上使用右美托咪定。比较两组患者手术恢复情况,包括拔管例数、呼吸恢复时间、补救镇痛情况、苏醒时间、术中出血量、拔管时间;病情恢复情况,包括进食时间、住院时间、术后首次排气时间、首次下床时间、排便时间。采用视觉模拟评分法评价患者术后疼痛程度,采用免疫比浊试剂盒检测患者免疫球蛋白(immunoglobulin,Ig) G、IgA、IgM 水平。采用术后恢复质量量表评估患者恢复状况,比较两组患者手术之后心律失常、血压下降、恶心、呕吐和头痛、头晕等并发症发生情况。结果 两组患者术中出血量、拔管时间、拔管例数差异无显著性(P>0.05),研究组患者补救镇痛率、呼吸恢复时间和苏醒时间均短于对照组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);术后2h、6h、12h、24h,对照组患者咳嗽时和静息时视觉模拟评分均高于研究组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);术前,两组患者IgM、IgG、IgA 差异无显著性(P>0.05),术后两组患者IgM、IgG、IgA 均上升,且研究组患者均高于对照组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);研究组患者首次下床时间、排便时间、术后首次排气时间、住院时间短于对照组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);术前1d,两组患者恢复质量量表得分差异无显著性(P>0.05);术后3d,研究组患者身体舒适度、恢复质量量表总得分、心理支持、疼痛、情绪状态得分高于对照组,差异有显著性(P<0.05);研究组患者恶心、呕吐、头痛、头晕发生率低于对照组,差异有显著性(P<0.05),两组患者心律失常、血压下降发生率差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞能够明显提高老年结直肠癌根治术患者镇痛效果,增强患者免疫能力,提高患者运动、胃肠功能,提高恢复质量。

关键词: 关键词:罗哌卡因, 结直肠癌, 老年, 腹横肌平面阻滞, 右美托咪定

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine transverse abdominis plane block on elderly patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer. Methods From July 2018 to July 2020, 64 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University were selected as the
research objects and randomly divided into study group and control group, 32 cases in each group, The control group was given ropivacaine transversus abdominis plane block, and the study group was given dexmedetomidine on the basis of the control group. The operation recovery of the two groups were compared, including extubation cases, respiratory recovery time, rescue analgesia, recovery time, intraoperative blood loss, extubation time; the condition recovery, including eating time, hospitalization time, postoperative first exhaust time, first out of bed time, defecation time. The degree of postoperative pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale. The levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA and IgM were detected by immunoturbidimetric method. The postoperative recovery quality scale was used to evaluate the recovery status of patients, and the incidence of arrhythmia, blood pressure drop, nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness and other complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, extubation time, and extubation cases between the two groups (P>0.05). The rescue analgesia rate, respiratory recovery time and recovery time of the study group were less than those of the control group (P<0.05); At 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h after operation, the scores of visual analogue at cough and rest in the control group were higher than those in the study group, with significant difference (P<0.05); Before operation, there was no significant difference in IgM, IgG and IgA between the two groups (P>0.05); After operation, IgM, IgG and IgA in the two groups were increased, and those in the study group were higher than those in the control group, with significant difference (P<0.05); The time of getting out of bed for the first time, defecation time, postoperative first exhaust time and hospitalization time of the study group were less than those of the control group, with significant difference (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in the score of recovery quality scale between the two groups on the first day before operation (P>0.05); On the third day after operation,
the scores of physical comfort, total score of recovery quality scale, psychological support, pain and emotional state of the study group were higher than those of the control group In the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.05); The incidence of nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness in the study group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of arrhythmia and blood pressure drop between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine transversus abdominis plane block can significantly improve the analgesic effect of elderly patients with colorectal cancer radical operation, enhance the immune ability of patients, improve the motor and gastrointestinal function of patients, and improve the quality of recovery.

Key words: Key words: Ropivacaine, Colorectal cancer, Elderly, Transversus abdominis plane block, Dexmedetomidine