临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 24-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

乳腺浸润性导管/ 小叶混合癌与浸润性小叶癌、导管癌的临床病理特征及预后差异

  

  1. 1. 深圳市龙华区中心医院 病理科,广东 深圳 518110; 2. 深圳市龙华区中心医院 普通外科,广东 深圳 518110
  • 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-05-07

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of invasive ductal/lobular mixed carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

  1. 1. Pathology department, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong;
    2. General surgery, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong
  • Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-05-07

摘要: 摘要: 目的 研究乳腺浸润性导管/ 小叶混合癌(infiltrative ductal/lobular mixed carcinoma,IDC-L)与浸润性小叶癌(infiltrative lobular carcinoma,ILC)及浸润性导管癌(infiltrative ductal carcinoma,IDC)病理特征及预后差异。方法 选择深圳市龙华区中心医院2011 年9 月至2020 年9 月收入的254 例乳腺癌患者,其中IDC-L 18 例,ILC 20 例,IDC 216 例,观察患者临床病理特征预后情况。结果 IDC-L、ILC 及IDC 患者在年龄、肿瘤大小、多中心病灶、脉管浸润、HER2 状态、Ki-67 表达方面具有明显差异,IDC-L 患者发病年龄较小、肿瘤直径>2.0cm 较多,而IDC 患者多中心病灶及脉管浸润较少,IDC-L 与ILC 患者的HER2 阳性及Ki-67 高表达比例均低于IDC,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。年龄、更年期状态、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、多中心病变、淋巴血管侵犯、HER2 状态、Ki-67 表达均是临床病理特征差异的影响因素。无乳腺癌间期(breast cancer-free interval,BCFi)、总生存期(overall survival,OS)与患者肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、淋巴血管侵犯、Ki-67 表达之间是存在一定关系(P<0.05)。结论 在乳腺癌患者中,ILC 与IDC-L 之间
临床病理特征存在一定相似,但三者有明显差异,临床可加以区分,以便对患者更好地进行治疗。

关键词: 关键词:乳腺浸润性导管/ 小叶混合癌, 浸润性小叶癌, 浸润性导管癌, 病理, 预后

Abstract: Abstracts: Objective To study the pathological characteristics of breast infiltrative ductal / lobular mixed carcinoma(IDC-L), infiltrative lobular carcinoma(ILC) and infiltrative ductal carcinoma(IDC). Methods From September 2011 to September 2020,254 breast cancer patients were selected, Among them, there were 18 cases of IDC-L, 20 cases of ILC and 216 cases of IDC. The prognosis of the three groups of patients was observed. Results IDC- L, ILC and IDC patients had significant differences in age, tumor size, multicentric lesions, vascular invasion, HER2 status, Ki-67 expression. IDC-L patients had younger onset age, more tumor diameter>2.0 cm, while IDC patients had less multicentric lesions and vascular invasion, while HER2 positive rate and Ki-67 high expression ratio in IDC-L and ILC patients were lower than IDC, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Age, climacteric state, tumor size, lymph node state, multicentric lesions, lymphatic vessel invasion, HER2 state and Ki-67 expression were all the influencing factors of clinic pathological differences. Breast cancer-free interval and overall survival were related to tumor size, lymph node status, lymphatic vessel invasion and Ki-67 expression (P<0.05). Conclusion In breast cancer patients, the clinicopathological characteristics of ILC and IDC-L are similar to each other, but there are obvious differences among ILC, IDC-L and IDC. The breast cancer patients can be differentiated clinically and treated better.

Key words: Key words: Invasive ductal/lobular mixed carcinoma of breast, Invasive lobular carcinoma, Invasive ductal carcinoma, Pathology, Prognosis