临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 47-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术处理胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的策略优化

  

  1. 南通市如东县中医院 普外科,江苏 南通 226400
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2026-01-30

The application value of modified same-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combine with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones

  1. General Surgery Department of Rudong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Nantong City, Jiangsu Nantong 226400, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-01-30

摘要:

目的 探究改良内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)同期手术在胆囊结石合并胆总管结石治疗中的应用价值。方法 纳入南通市如东县中医院 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 12 月收治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者60 例,采用随机数字表法分为分期组(30 例,先行 ERCP 治疗,再行 LC 治疗)与同期组(改良体位下同期行 ERCP 与 LC 治疗)。比较两组围手术期指标、生化指标、预后指标。结果 两组结石清除率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。同期组患者的手术时间、排气时间、住院时间均短于分期组,术后 3d VAS 评分低于分期组,住院总费用少于分期组,术后 5d 血清淀粉酶、总胆红素、总胆汁酸、C 反应蛋白、γ干扰素、白细胞介素 -6水平低于分期组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05);术后 3 个月生活质量评分高于分期组(P < 0.05);两组患者的并发症发生率、结石复发率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论 相较于分期 ERCP-LC 手术而言,改良ERCP-LC 同期手术在康复周期缩短、治疗费用减少、炎症反应降低、预后改善等方面更具优势。

关键词: 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术, 腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 胆囊结石, 胆总管结石, 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective To explore the application value of modified same-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of gallstones with common bile duct stones.Method Sixty patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones admitted to the Department of General Surgery at Rudong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Nantong City between January 2023 and December 2024 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into a staged group (30 cases, treated with ERCP followed by LC) and a same-stage group (30 cases, treated with modified same-stage ERCP and LC). Perioperative indicators, biochemical markers, and prognostic outcomes were compared between the two groups. Result There was no significant difference in stone clearance rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The surgical time, exhaust time, and hospitalization time of patients in the same group were shorter than those in the staging group. The VAS score on postoperative day 3 was lower than that in the staging group, and the total hospitalization cost was lower than that in the staging group. The serum amylase, total bilirubin, total bile acid, C reactive protein, interferon - γ, and interleukin-6 levels on postoperative day 5 were lower than those in the staging group, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05); The quality of life score at 3 months after surgery was higher than that of the staging group (P < 0.05); There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and stone recurrence between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared to staged ERCP-LC surgery, the modified same-stage ERCP-LC approach offers advantages in shortening recovery time, reducing treatment costs, mitigating infl ammatory responses, and improving prognosis.

Key words: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystolithiasis, Common bile duct stones, Quality of life