临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 101-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于信息 - 干预 - 反馈 - 评估 - 响应模式的心理护理干预对腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者疼痛程度及睡眠质量的影响

  

  1. 盐城市建湖县人民医院 手术室,江苏 盐城 224700
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2026-01-30

The influence of psychological nursing intervention based on the  information-intervention-feedback-assessment-response model on the pain degree and sleep quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery

  1. Operating Room of Jianhu County People's Hospital in Yancheng City, Jiangsu Yancheng 224700, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-01-30

摘要:

目的 探讨基于信息 - 干预 - 反馈 - 评估 - 响应(information-intervention-feedback-assessmentresponse,IIFAR)模式的心理护理干预对腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者疼痛程度及睡眠质量的影响,为临床护理干预提供参考依据。方法 选取建湖县人民医院 2024 年 1 月至 2025 年 1 月接受腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者 76 例,根据护理模式不同分为观察组与对照组,各 38 例。接受基于 IIFAR 模式的患者作为观察组,另选同期接受常规护理的此类患者为对照组。比较两组患者护理前后疼痛程度、负性情绪及睡眠质量等。结果 护理前,两组患者的视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)评分,以及匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)、健康调查量表 36(36-item short form health survey,SF-36)评分比较无显著差异(P > 0.05)。护理后,观察组患者的 VAS 评分、SAS 评分、SDS 评分均低于对照组,差异有显著性(P < 0.01);PSQI 评分低于对照组,SF-36 评分高于对照组,差异有显著性(P ≤ 0.001)。观察组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有显著性(P < 0.05)。结论 基于 IIFAR 模式的心理护理干预可有效减轻腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者的术后疼痛程度,改善睡眠质量和生活质量,提升患者护理满意度。

关键词: 信息 -干预-反馈-评估-响应模式, 心理护理, 腹腔镜, 胃肠道手术

Abstract:

Objective To explore the influence of psychological nursing intervention based on the information-intervention-feedback-assessment-response (IIFAR) information nursing model on the pain degree and sleep quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, and to provide a reference basis for clinical nursing intervention. Method A total of 76 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery at Jianhu County People's Hospital from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group, with 38 cases in each group based on different nursing models. Patients receiving care based on the IIFAR model were assigned to the observation group, while another 38 patients who received conventional care during the same period were selected as the control group. The pain levels, negative emotions, and sleep quality of the patients in both groups were compared before and after nursing interventions. Result Before nursing, there were no significant differences in the visual analog scale(VAS) scores, self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) scores, self-rating depression scale(SDS) scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI), and 36-item short form health survey(SF-36) scores between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). After nursing, the VAS, SAS, and SDS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.01); the PSQI score was lower, while the SF-36 score was higher, with significant differences (P ≤ 0.001). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Psychological nursing interventions based on the IIFAR model can effectively reduce postoperative pain levels, improve sleep quality and quality of life, and enhance patient satisfaction in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Key words: Information-intervention-feedback-assessment-response model, Psychological care, Laparoscopy; Gastrointestinal surgery