临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 84-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

激励式护理对直肠癌手术患者自护能力、生活质量的影响分析

  

  1. 荆州市公安县人民医院 胃肠外科,湖北 荆州 434300
  • 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-11-21

The effect analysis of incentive nursing on self-care ability and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer surgery

  1. Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Gong'an People's Hospital in Jingzhou, Hubei Jingzhou 434300, China
  • Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-11-21

摘要:

目的 探讨激励式护理应用于直肠癌手术患者的效果。方法 选取荆州市公安县人民医院 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 12 月收治的 74 例直肠癌手术的患者,采用双色球法分为参照组、观察组,各 37 例。前者行常规护理,后者行激励式护理,比对自护能力、心理状态、希望水平、生活质量、满意度。结果 护理前,两组患者的自我维护能力量表 (self-maintenance ability scale for adults,ESCA) 评分、焦虑自评量表 (self-rating anxiety scale,SAS) 评分、抑郁自评量表 (self-rating depression scale,SDS) 评分及希望水平评分比较无显著差异(P > 0.05)。护理后,两组患者的 ESCA 评分及希望水平评分较护理前有所提高(P < 0.001),且观察组患者的 ESCA 评分、希望水平评分高于参照组,SAS 评分、SDS 评分低于参照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.001);生活质量方面,观察组患者各项评分均高于参照组,差异有显著性(P < 0.001)。观察组满意度 97.30%,高于参照组(83.78%),差异有显著性(P < 0.05)。结论 激励式护理应用于直肠癌手术患者效果良好,提升其自护能力的同时,可促进后续生活质量的提高。

关键词: 激励式护理, 直肠癌, 自我护理能力, 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of incentive nursing on patients with rectal cancer surgery. Method 74 patients with rectal cancer who were treated in Jingzhou Gong'an County People's Hospital from December 2022 to December 2023 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group by double color ball method, 37 cases in each group. The former received routine nursing, while the latter received incentive nursing. The self-care ability, psychological status, hope level, quality of life and satisfaction were compared. Result Before nursing, there was no significant difference in self-maintenance ability scale for adults(ESCA) score, self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) score, self-rating depression scale(SDS) score and hope level score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After nursing, the ESCA score and hope level score of the two groups were improved compared with those before nursing (P < 0.001), and the ESCA score and hope level score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, while the SAS score and SDS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, with significant differences (P < 0.001); In terms of quality of life, the scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.001). The satisfaction of the observation group was 97.30%, which was higher than that of the reference group (83.78%), and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of incentive nursing in patients who undergone surgery for rectal cancer has good effects. While improving their self-care ability, it can also promote the improvement of their subsequent quality of life.

Key words: Incentive care, Rectal cancer, Self-care ability, Quality of life