临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 22-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同气腹压力对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者术后苏醒期质量的影响

  

  1. 高州市中医院 手术室,广东 高州 525200
  • 出版日期:2024-10-01 发布日期:2024-12-25

Eff ect of diff erent pneumoperitoneum pressure on the quality of recovery period after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer patients

  1. Operating Room of Gaozhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangdong Gaozhou 525200, China
  • Online:2024-10-01 Published:2024-12-25

摘要:

目的 探 讨 不 同 气 腹 压 力 在 腹 腔 镜 结 直 肠 癌 根 治 术(laparoscopic colorectal-carcinoma surgery,LCS)患者的效果和对术后苏醒期质量的影响。方法 选取 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 10 月高州市中医院收治的对 70 例 LCS 患者,根据人工气腹压力的不同分为对照组(气腹压力控制在 13 ~ 15mmHg)与观察组(气腹压力控制为 8 ~ 12mmHg),各 35 例。比较两组患者的苏醒质量、认知功能、应激反应指标、胃肠功能恢复情况。结果 两组患者的拔管时间、麻醉苏醒时间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。观察组患者的苏醒期躁动发生率较对照组更低,且肠鸣音恢复、肛门排气、术后禁食时间相较于对照组更短,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05)。两组患者术后 1d、3d、7d 的简易精神状态检查量表评分均低于术前 1d,且观察组评分高于对照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05)。T1 ~ T3 时刻较 T0 时刻,两组的皮质醇、C 反应蛋白水平均升高,且观察组 T1 ~ T3 时刻皮质醇、C 反应蛋白水平均低于同时刻对照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05)。结论 相较于高气腹压力,LCS 治疗中采取低气腹压力对患者认知功能、胃肠功能和机体应激反应影响更小,可以降低苏醒期躁动发生风险。

关键词: 气腹压力, 腹腔镜, 结直肠癌根治术, 苏醒期质量, 应激反应

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCS) and their impact on the quality of postoperative recovery period. Method 70 patients with LCS admitted to Gaozhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from October 2022 to October 2023 were selected and divided into a control group (controlled at 13 ~ 15mmHg) and an observation group (controlled at 8 ~ 12mmHg) based on diff erent levels of artifi cial pneumoperitoneum pressure, with 35 patients in each group. Result Compare the quality of recovery, cognitive function, stress response indicators, and gastrointestinal function recovery between two groups of patients. There was no significant diff erence in extubation time and anesthesia recovery time between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). The incidence of agitation during the awakening period in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the recovery of bowel sounds, anal exhaust, and postoperative fasting time were shorter than those in the control group, with signifi cant diff erences (P < 0.05). The scores of the simple mental state examination scale for both groups of patients on postoperative day 1, 3, and 7 were lower than those on preoperative day 1, and the scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, with signifi cant diff erences (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, the levels of cortisol and C-reactive protein in both groups increased from T1 to T3, and the levels of cortisol and C-reactive protein in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at the same time, with signifi cant diff erences (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with high pneumoperitoneum pressure, adopting low pneumoperitoneum pressure in LCS treatment has less impact on patients' cognitive function, gastrointestinal function, and stress response, and can reduce the risk of agitation during the recovery period.

Key words: Pneumoperitoneum pressure, Laparoscope, Radical resection of colorectal cancer, Quality during the awakening period, Stress response