煤与城市生活垃圾共热解焦油成分分析

燃料与化工 ›› 2011, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1-4.

• 综述与专论 • 下一篇

煤与城市生活垃圾共热解焦油成分分析

刘波1,2 李世青2 廖洪强2 王忠卫1 吴朝锋2

1.山东科技大学，青岛 266510；2.首钢总公司环保产业事业部设计技术中心，北京 100041

出版日期:2011-11-30

Composition analysis on co-pyrolysis tar of coal and municipal solid waste

Liu Bo1,2 Li Shiqing2 Liao Hongqiang2 Wang Zhongwei1 Wu Chaofeng2

1.Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266510, China;
2. Technology Center of Shougang Environmental Protection Industrial Department, Beijing 100041, China

Online:2011-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2kg模拟焦炉系统进行煤、城市生活垃圾单独热解和两者不同配比下共热解实验，对所得焦油成分进行分析，结果表明，神华煤热解焦油成分主要以芳香烃（41.13%）和烷烃（30.79%）为主；生活垃圾热解焦油成分主要以烯烃（25.70%）和烷烃（28.38%）为主。与理论计算数据相比，共热解焦油中苯萘类油含量增加3.20%～7.97%，链烃类（烷烃和烯烃）含量增加10.14%～12.69%，含氧官能团有机物成分减少6.6%～14.64%，共热解焦油成分呈现出明显的“链烃化”趋势。

Abstract:

The composition of tar obtained from independent pyrolysis of coal and municipal solid waste and co-pyrolysis of coal and municipal solid waste under different blending ratio by means of 2kg simulating coke oven system was analyzed. The result showed that the composition of tar from pyrolysis of Shenhua coal was mainly contained with aromatic hydrocarbon（41.13%）and alkane（30.79%）；the composition of tar from pyrolysis of municipal solid waste was mainly contained with olefine（25.70%）and alkane（28.38%）. Compared with the data from theoretical calculation, the oil content such as benzene and naphthalene in co-pyrolytic tar was increased by 3.20%~7.97%, the content of chain hydrocarbon（alkane and ole fine） was increased by 10.14%~ 12.69%, the organic composition of the oxygen-bearing functional group was reduced by 6.6% ~ 14.64%, the composition of tar from pyrolysishad the obvious “chain hydrocarhylation” tendency.

中图分类号:

TQ522

刘波1,2 李世青2 廖洪强2 王忠卫1 吴朝锋2. 煤与城市生活垃圾共热解焦油成分分析[J]. 燃料与化工, 2011, 42(6): 1-4.

Liu Bo1,2 Li Shiqing2 Liao Hongqiang2 Wang Zhongwei1 Wu Chaofeng2. Composition analysis on co-pyrolysis tar of coal and municipal solid waste[J]. FUEL & CHEMICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 42(6): 1-4.

[1]	来威吴秋阳巩力强延井超. 炼焦重复试验误差超标的研究[J]. 燃料与化工, 2018, 49(4): 21-23.
[2]	刘占博赵恒波周鹏党平彭磊. 7m焦炉边火道辅助加热系统的改进[J]. 燃料与化工, 2018, 49(4): 24-26.
[3]	马晓龙1 马殿宇2 张琦1 李超1 李荣娇1. 一种制备各向同性焦的方法[J]. 燃料与化工, 2018, 49(4): 46-48.
[4]	桂敏何一兵刘小敏张志刚. 蒽油采出泵密封的研究与改进[J]. 燃料与化工, 2018, 49(3): 60-61.
[5]	岳进. 焦炉长结焦时间下炉温的控制与管理[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(5): 43-44.
[6]	江鑫付利俊. 蒸馏法检测轻苯终点主要误差来源及管控[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(4): 34-36.
[7]	刘冬杰1 杨峰2 穆春丰2 张春华3. 9-芴甲醇的合成研究[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(3): 38-41.
[8]	于洪涛张亦弛迟宇. 浅析油库储罐的泡沫灭火及水冷却系统[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(3): 62-54.
[9]	李申明付宇张阁蔡润珂. 带式输送机节能降耗研究[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(2): 19-20.
[10]	来威杨洪海吴秋阳徐庆阳韩剑. PDCA循环在焦化生产中的应用[J]. 燃料与化工, 2017, 48(1): 30-31.
[11]	钟继生. 洗苯塔阻力的探讨[J]. 燃料与化工, 2016, 47(6): 52-54.
[12]	赖云杰. U型管导烟技术在捣固焦炉的应用[J]. 燃料与化工, 2016, 47(5): 28-30.
[13]	尹文亮赵国海史争光姚怀伟郝晓洁. 提高粗苯收率的生产实践[J]. 燃料与化工, 2016, 47(5): 43-44.
[14]	牟彪孔祥勇. 捣固余煤配入比例对焦炭质量的影响[J]. 燃料与化工, 2016, 47(4): 14-15.
[15]	罗伟1 谷文彬1 王瑞1 杨建华2. 干熄焦的经济运行分析[J]. 燃料与化工, 2016, 47(4): 19-20.