临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 45-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜联合胆管镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床应用研究

  

  1. 中国人民解放军陆军第九四六医院 普外科,新疆 伊宁 835000
  • 出版日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-08-07

Clinical application of laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones

  1. General Surgery Department of the 946th Army Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Xinjiang Yining 835000, China
  • Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-08-07

摘要:

目的 研究腹腔镜联合胆管镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的临床效果。方法 选取中国人民解放军陆军第九四六医院在 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 12 月收治的 60 例胆囊结石伴胆总管结石患者,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组。对照组(n=30)实施腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术进行治疗,观察组(n=30)实施腹腔镜联合胆管镜经胆囊管胆管探查取石术进行治疗,比较两组患者的各项围手术期指标,治疗前后炎症因子水平、应激反应指标,以及术后并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者的术中出血量少于对照组,住院时间、手术时间、切口愈合时间、首次下床活动时间、首次肛门排气时间及肠鸣音恢复时间均短于对照组差异均有显著性(P < 0.001)。治疗前,两组患者的炎症因子水平、应激反应指标比较无显著差异(P > 0.05);治疗后,观察组患者的肿瘤坏死因子 -α、白介素 -6、C 反应蛋白及血清淀粉酶水平均低于对照组且肾上腺素、超氧化物歧化酶水平低于对照组,丙二醛水平高于对照组,差异均有显著性(P < 0.05)。术后,观察组患者发生 1 例胆瘘、1 例感染,并发症总发生率为 6.67%;对照组发生 3 例胆漏、2 例腹腔感染、2 例胆管出血,观察组术后并发症总发生率低于对照组(23.33%),差异有显著性(χ2=5.192,P=0.023)。结论 胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者通过腹腔镜联合胆管镜经胆囊管胆管探查取石术治疗,可促进患者康复,降低术后并发症发生风险,改善炎症因子以及应激反应指标。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 胆管镜, 胆囊结石, 胆总管结石, 炎症因子, 应激反应

Abstract:

Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones. Method 60 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis who were admitted to the 946 Army Hospital of the People's Liberation Army from January 2023 to December 2024 were selected and grouped according to the random number table. The control group (n=30) underwent laparoscopic common bile duct incision and stone removal surgery for treatment, while the observation group (n=30) underwent laparoscopic combined bile duct exploration and stone removal surgery through the gallbladder duct. The perioperative indicators, levels of infl ammatory factors, stress response indicators, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups of patients. Result The intraoperative bleeding volume of patients in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the hospitalization time, surgical time, incision healing time, fi rst mobilization time, fi rst anal exhaust time, and bowel sound recovery time were all signifi cantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.001). Before treatment, there was no signifi cant diff erence in the levels of infl ammatory factors and stress response indicators between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05); After treatment, the levels of T tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, C reactive protein, and serum amylase in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the levels of adrenaline and superoxide dismutase were lower than those in the control group. The levels of malondialdehyde were higher than those in the control group, and the diff erences were signifi cant (P < 0.05). After surgery, there was 1 case of bile leakage and 1 case of infection in the observation group, with a total incidence of complications of 6.67%; The control group experienced 3 cases of bile leakage, 2 cases of abdominal infection, and 2 cases of bile duct bleeding. The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (23.33%), and the diff erence was signifi cant (χ2=5.192, P=0.023). Conclusion The treatment of patients with gallstones combined with common bile duct stones through laparoscopic and choledochoscopy exploration of the gallbladder duct and bile duct can promote patient recovery, reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and improve infl ammatory factors and stress indicators.

Key words: Laparoscopy, Choledochoscopy, Gallstones, Common bile duct stones, Inflammatory factors, Stress response indicators