临床普外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 13-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

年轻结直肠癌术后异时性肝转移的危险因素分析

  

  1. 江门市中心医院 胃肠外科,广东 江门 529000
  • 出版日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-08-07
  • 基金资助:

    广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2023305);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2021A1515220175);江门市医疗卫生领域科技计划项目(2024YL01013)

Analysis of risk factors for metachronous liver metastasis after surgery in young patients with colorectal cancer

  1. Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Jiangmen Central Hospital, Guangdong Jiangmen 529000, China
  • Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-08-07

摘要:

目的 分析影响年轻结直肠癌术后异时性肝转移的危险因素。方法 分析 2011 年 2 月至 2018年 1 月江门市中心医院收治的 55 例年轻结直肠癌术后异时性肝转移病例(发生组)及 55 例排除异时性肝转移的年轻结直肠癌术后病例的临床资料(未发生组),采用 Logistic 回归分析影响年轻结直肠癌异时性肝转移的独立危险因素。结果 发生组和未发生组的同时性肝转移、病理分级、组织类型、浸润深度、淋巴结转移及家族史比较,差异有显著性(P < 0.05)。多因素 Logistic 回归分析显示,同时性肝转移、病理分级、浸润深度及淋巴结转移为年轻结直肠癌术后异时性肝转移的独立危险因素(OR=1.881、1.142、1.501、2.734,P < 0.05)。结论 临床中可综合上述独立危险因素,合理评估患者异时性肝转移风险,以提高异时性肝转移患者生存率。

关键词: 结直肠癌, 异时性肝转移, 年轻, 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the risk factors for postoperative metachronous liver metastasis in young patients with colorectal cancer. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 55 young postoperative cases of colorectal cancer with metachronous liver metastasis(occurrence group) and 55 young postoperative cases of colorectal cancer excluding metachronous liver metastasis(no occurrence group)from February 2011 to January 2018 in Jiangmen Central Hospital. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors aff ecting metachronous liver metastasis in young colorectal cancer patients. Result There were significant differences in concurrent liver metastasis, pathological grading, tissue type, depth of infiltration, lymph node metastasis, and family history between the group with and without the occurrence of the disease (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that synchronous liver metastasis, pathological grading, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for postoperative metachronous liver metastasis in young colorectal cancer patients (OR=1.881, 1.142, 1.501, 2.734, P < 0.05). Conclusion In clinical practice, the independent risk factors mentioned above can be comprehensively evaluated to reasonably assess the risk of metachronous liver metastasis in patients, in order to improve the survival rate of patients with metachronous liver metastasis.

Key words: Colorectal cancer, Metachronous liver metastasis, Young, Risk factors